I garden for wildlife, state of water for the inhabitants is more important than appearance for me.
Marlorena says:Dig it up, discard it, and get another one.... probably get a half decent one from Aldi or similar for £2.. and put it down to experience...this one you have isn't worth bothering with I think...See original post
Dig it up, discard it, and get another one.... probably get a half decent one from Aldi or similar for £2.. and put it down to experience...this one you have isn't worth bothering with I think...
That would be my assessment as well.
I googled STAX, it looked like a trade only builders merchant so maybe not the right STAX
Blue roses like 'Blue Moon' would be more accurately described as dirty mauve, though some people love them
does it look right? are you sure you've got the right rose?
Logic says it's very unlikely that when a scented rose flowers the first time it will not be scented.
Hmm. Not sure I know what I'm talking about so won't risk any suggestions.
Your dad is right. Your should be able to see where the graft is at the base of the plant, anything growing from below that is a wild rose sucker. Anything above is your rose.
Small ponds do get warm which encourages algae. Some shade from the full heat of the day helps. You often hear that ponds should be sited in full sun but I think that's so the water lilies flower well. There are many statements like that in gardening that are passed on (and on) without understanding of the reasons.
I would never put chemical junk in a pond. It's like prescribed drugs, they might work but always side effects.
I had ramshorn snails for years but never see them now, no idea why
Last edited: 06 June 2017 12:42:16
I would say ash as well